Top
Best
New

Posted by 737max 8 hours ago

Gemini 4 Argon(deepmind.google)
See also: Gemini 4 Argon for Robotics - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50074869
900 points | 700 commentspage 5
alexmr 2 hours ago|
I am impressed by how fast it is. Haven't run all my evals but it's surprisngly quick for creating files
ssernikk 1 hour ago|
Their previous best model - Gemini 3.8 Flash (also when set to high) was even faster. A appreciate it that they focus on speed. I's great for LLM pair-programming.
ssernikk 2 hours ago||
It's nice to have it available for more complex tasks, but I'll stick with 3.8 Flash thanks to its high output speed. I really like it for fast iteration and prototyping.
yoz-y 8 hours ago||
Excited to finally see this out. When new big models come out I like to make them audit any other code I generated to see how things are.
efficax 7 hours ago||
Only available on Ultra, so I thought maybe I'll try it for one month to see if it's good. Well, I have Google One and for some reason this means I cannot sign up for AI Ultra? This is just one of the worst product rollouts I've ever seen
mchusma 7 hours ago|
Website says its available on Pro too, but i have pro and can't access it.
ketzu 6 hours ago|||
I checked gemini, set it to "gemini 4 argon" and it offered me Pro and Ultra to get access. I checked the normal plans, saw there is also plus.

Okay, so I'll get Pro to try it.

I subscribe.

No gemini 4.

The most generous reading I have is that it's a mistake. But I also downloaded the PC app, and now I really wonder why I did that, it seems to offer nothing beyond the web experience and also doesn't even know its a local app. (When asked about its capabilities it always responded with reasons pertaining to it being a web app.)

llm_nerd 4 hours ago|||
It's available to Pro in the Gemini app (and the gemini.google.com). It isn't available in antigravity. They know that the people who are using these tools for coding are most likely to cough up for the Ultra subscription.

EDIT: Okay, the AI plans page claims under pro - "Expanded access to Gemini 4 Argon in Google Antigravity." So maybe it is just a matter of it rolling out. Though Google has a long history of serious confusing and misinformation on those tier descriptions.

EDIT2: And they changed it again, and now it is explicitly excluded from antigravity for Pro users.

parallax_error 3 hours ago||
Maybe they could ask Gemini to fix their awful website to not crash on my phone!
Trusteando 7 hours ago||
Right now there are two top posts one about GLM-Legal and one about Argon. Both score about the same in the Harvey Lab test, but the prices are $0.15 versus $10.55, the $0.15 is Vals AI's estimate using the base model since GLM-Legal has not published prices.
dyauspitr 7 hours ago|
Yeah, but one is a general purpose model, and the other one is specifically geared towards the legal field. Considering Opus 5.5 only gets a 4% on the test compared to Gemini’s 20%, that’s actually pretty incredible.
bezko 8 hours ago||
can't use in agy with Pro subscription:

Unavailable · Gemini 4 Argon is currently available to Ultra plan subscribers.

staticman2 7 hours ago|
They just removed 3.1 Pro from antigravity pro so I certainly hope Argon will be added soon
fusslo 5 hours ago||
As I approach a transitional period in my career, I'm reflecting on the managerial effort of places like google. How on earth do they keep an engineering org on the 'right track'? I work on products that are not as complex: fewer moving parts, fewer egos, no where near as novel. It feels like nobody does anything and nobody has any expertise

is it just 'Hire the right people'?

serioussecurity 5 hours ago||
It's a quarter million people (including temps/vendors/contractors) over almost 28 years. There's no "just" here.

It's extremely inconsistent internally as well.

Look up the slime mold analogy for Google.

boelboel 5 hours ago||
Makes me wonder if more growth/innovation could've happened (outside of google) if they didn't employ this many people. Some sort of dutch disease within the higher echelons of the tech sector.
Eridrus 5 hours ago||
Yes and no.

Google did a very good job on things that required longer research times and compute scale, note that Transformers, BERT & Scaling Laws came out of Google (though the latter were also worked on at OpenAI).

Conversely, Google is horrible at product, and without OpenAI, it probably would have taken many years longer to take off. I know this because Google had demos of this internally, but absolutely no stomach to release it, and they didn't believe in the API use case at all.

Which is to say, I think if Google was smaller, we probably would have gotten more SaaS, not more breakthrough research.

estearum 5 hours ago|||
Bottomless buckets of money produced by their web monopoly so they can continue on at pace, virtually regardless of how inefficiently they do it.
arjie 5 hours ago|||
It’s like the USA. How do they keep people on track? They don’t. You delegate and hope things work. When they have Google Ads and Search they can experiment a lot and “waste” a lot in search.
Eridrus 5 hours ago|||
They haven't solved management and definitely don't keep things "on track" globally. However, they definitely don't have the problem that nobody does anything and nobody has any expertise.

It's also worth noting, Gemini 3.5 Pro never came out.

Having worked there (but only in a small part of it that eventually got absorbed into Gemini), it's some combination of:

* The eye of Sauron (management) can make specific spots (e.g. Gemini) push harder (and attract the motivated people at the company and be selective)

* They hire a lot better than average (Generally from the top 10%, hotter places in Google are more selective)

* They have a promo process that gives career motivated people a way to prove themselves (not always aligned with things being on the right track ofc, and not always non-political, but they definitely do something)

* Redundancy in teams causes them to compete (not necessarily productively)

Of course, there are other downsides not listed here (insane bureaucracy for launches, GDPR/BCID compliance, etc, etc), but a lot of what makes Google possible is the insane amounts of cash Search throws off.

jacquesm 5 hours ago|||
I think the google graveyard is a partial answer to that question.
IncreasePosts 5 hours ago||
Google has tried a lot of ideas and then abandoned them, but has it fumbled any already successful product?

Perhaps one of their more successful chat clients, but that's all I can think of

jacquesm 5 hours ago||
Success for google is defined in a different way than it would be for an ordinary company and many of those would have been successful if they had started outside of google.

The really annoying ones are the ones they buy, and then shutter because they can't make enough money on them fast enough.

ceejayoz 5 hours ago||
> How on earth do they keep an engineering org on the 'right track'?

What if the answer is "they don't"?

le-mark 2 hours ago||
I can’t try it because it’s not available on the free tier and no way in hell I’m tying a credit card to google, I’ll wait for argon-lite.
algoth1 8 hours ago|
Gemini 3.1 is still SOTA at weird handwriting recognition. If Argon is better it will be amazing
spwa4 7 hours ago|
I bet that's one of those areas where a finetune of a 4B model will wipe the floor with anything else.
matt123456789 6 hours ago||
For readable or normal handwriting yes, big models are overkill. But weird handwriting is mostly edge cases. Bitter lesson territory.
spwa4 4 hours ago||
If you can detect -> finetune -> rollout it doesn't have to be a problem.
More comments...