Top
Best
New

Posted by rbanffy 11 hours ago

Alternatives to animal testing are finally taking off(spectrum.ieee.org)
285 points | 86 commentspage 2
RoshanAmble 5 hours ago||
I think one of the more egrigious cases that this could help avoid in the future is Neuralink using UC Davis's monkeys
narrator 4 hours ago||
Meanwhile, in China. https://faunalytics.org/animal-research-in-china/
_doctor_love 9 hours ago||
“It’s people man! We’re the ones who are miserable, so why shouldn’t we get to try it all first?!”

- Sealab 2021

greenavocado 9 hours ago||
This was already figured out and built out years ago https://www.darpa.mil/research/programs/microphysiological-s...
bix6 7 hours ago||
better link https://www.darpa.mil/news/features/microphysiological-syste...
moralestapia 8 hours ago|||
I believe that the issue is not that we are not capable of, it's just that we don't want to do it or give priority to it.

All the while people with massive power and resources are just wasting them on gimmicks and plots to keep increasing their net worth, power, all of that.

The one who don't care have all the power, the ones who care have none.

lirolero 7 hours ago||
[dead]
superkuh 7 hours ago||
The massive increases of medical research spending to useful outcomes directly track the decrease in testing in humans and then animals. False positives from doing research in systems that are not the systems the medicine will be used in results in the observed waste and lack of progress compared to, say, the 1950s.

I am not saying we should not have stopped directly testing in humans or animals. But I am saying that the result has been worse outcomes. And any further shifts away from the biological systems that need the medicine (like using computational crap like LLMs) will further increase this disconnect.

leopoldcongo 8 hours ago||
[dead]
EchoWave22 6 hours ago||
[dead]
aaron695 9 hours ago|
[dead]
More comments...