Top
Best
New

Posted by AshleysBrain 8 hours ago

Facebook Pages require paid subscription to post more than two links per month(mastodon.gamedev.place)
392 points | 350 commentspage 3
yipinwong 6 hours ago|
Why not go with Youtube route of force-feeding/shoving ADs in our face for having to share more links?

1. This will force users to keep sharing 2. get more ADs revenue 3. People get fed up and switch to $50/ month plan

similar to how Youtube did. I am fed up and ended up signing upf or youtube premimum.

zahrevsky 7 hours ago||
Do they even know what H stands for in HTML?
1970-01-01 6 hours ago||
>Don't know why we bother with them.

It's very much a bandwagon mentality. "We" is you.

ktosobcy 4 hours ago||
Extortionist mafia is getting more extorionist...

EU should just blok meta(fb/inst)/x|twatter/tiktok and rest of usanian BigTech at this point…

twodave 6 hours ago||
Almost certainly a way to mitigate bots and spam. Not surprised in the slightest.
billyp-rva 6 hours ago||
Fun historical note: one of the first applications of the internet was the "world wide web" (WWW). The idea was people that people would host HTML files on the internet that would be connect to each other using "links" to form a web of "sites" (called, of course, "websites"). You can still find these websites on the internet if you leave the walled gardens and paywalls, but it takes some effort.
SwellJoe 7 hours ago||
Surveillance capitalists have built a truly miserable internet.

I've been researching local newspapers, and the problems they face, lately, and one of them is that none of the social media sites allow them to get any visits from their followers because they either significantly de-rank posts with links off-site or it costs money to reach followers with links, or both. Of course Google scraping their sites and summarizing is another symptom of the same problem; FAANG wants all the revenue and a monopoly on what you see. Every penny every eyeball. None for small businesses, none for independent media, none for individuals.

xp84 5 hours ago||
The local newspapers are already cooked. Because of what you say, and because Alden Global already owns most of them and has fired 90% of the staff. My hometown paper features about one local story per week now, plus two copy pasted booking reports (I can tell because there’s some kind of encoding error that always eats hyphens, so people’s hyphenated names are always CamelCased instead. They sold their building 10 years ago and now operate out of a small office with about two desks.
billyp-rva 6 hours ago|||
Have any of them seriously considered going back to print-only?
gdulli 6 hours ago||
> Surveillance capitalists have built a truly miserable internet.

The way I saw it put recently: the internet used to be a library and now it's a store.

xp84 5 hours ago||
I’d be very satisfied with a store. It’s more like a bazaar where half the patrons are pickpockets and half the stalls are selling counterfeit stuff that will harm you. And there are no police to protect you from any of that (though you do get temporarily ejected if you say words that aren’t allowed, like “kill” or “rape” - in any context including honest reporting).
Benard-dev 6 hours ago||
I didn't know this and kept sharing links on my new page and it was banned from posting.I tried to look for support but just received responses from bots all the time and no human review until I gave up. I ended up starting another page.
mcmcmc 4 hours ago||
Probably an unpopular take, but this is not a bad thing. Maybe weird on it being for link sharing, but it’s always been deeply anticompetitive to offer a free webpage. It’s bad for the market for them to set the price of hosting a webpage for a business at zero, and the network effects make it easier for them to lock businesses in
margalabargala 3 hours ago|
That's not what this is though.

If your facebook page were your hosted website, everything's fine and dandy. Cost is still zero!

This move punishes people who do have their own website that they are paying for, and also have a facebook page that links to the main site.

mcmcmc 3 hours ago||
Right, but my opinion is that they should charge everyone. This is at least a step in that direction. It’s not “punishing” anyone, it’s making just making it more clear that instead of money they want you to pay with engagement. Apparently 2 links a month is enough of a loss in engagement that the marginal cost of hosting their page outweighs the value Meta gains from having that business on the platform for “free”.
totetsu 7 hours ago|
What if i just post a QR code?
More comments...