Top
Best
New

Posted by edward 11 hours ago

Humans will never again create a project like Wikipedia(www.economist.com)
355 points | 283 commentspage 4
hn_submit 10 hours ago|
Because...money, money, money!!

Can you expect less from a magazine that prays at the altar of capitalism?

People make brilliant things out of altruism as long as they don't have the feeling they're being abused by corporate or monetary interests. That's why the BSD Unixes languished and Linux thrived. Programmers didn't feel the need to contribute for free when companies where the ones reaping the benefits of their work.

Here's a shout-out to OpenStreetMap and its contributors.

illusive4080 10 hours ago|
What do you mean? Linux is thriving and companies benefit.
TheCycoONE 9 hours ago||
Probably that the companies that benefit the most also pay it back. Though I'm not convinced that's due to the GPL 2, since the binaries rarely need to be shipped outside of the company's own server farms the legal distinction between BSD and GPL is largely moot.
G_o_D 10 hours ago||
I think all those famdoms, main wikipedia etc should be backed up in multiple archives and should be provided to as many libraries for offline read.
zhouzhao 9 hours ago||
many "fandom" wikis have alternatives. If you can spare the time, scroll a little bit further down in your search results. They exist! And for the ones that do not have a "fandom" wiki, there are alternative readers.

Fandom is truly cancerous. I have not checked whether they are affiliated with Wikimedia, but I would not be surprised if that was the case!

Skwid 9 hours ago||
Good news, that's all already happened!
andai 9 hours ago||
There's a lot of things like that, which were made by one person, or a small company, right?

Internet Archive is in the same category. So was Flash.

It's kind of amazing to think that, if it weren't for those people (or if they'd had a bit less conviction in their beliefs), we might live in a world without these wonders!

It also makes me wonder what else we might have gotten, but didn't. (Or more constructively, what else ought to exist, but nobody's built it yet!)

Doctor_Fegg 9 hours ago||
I wrote about this in the context of OpenStreetMap a couple of years ago (https://blog.systemed.net/post/18), but with rather different reasoning:

> We didn’t realise it at the time, but OpenStreetMap came from a unique moment in internet history.

> It was still the time of the Old Internet. The time when you, or anyone, could upload a few pages to your own “webspace” or “homepage”, writing about what took your fancy. You didn’t have to worry about Facebook and Google as gatekeepers, or HTTPS, or your server being compromised within five minutes of turning on, or GDPR, or front-end frameworks, or any of the curses of the modern web.

> 2004 was when the homegrown web met the participatory web, before it all got turned to shit by Facebook and Google. You wouldn’t start OSM in 2024: the nascent project would be squashed by Google, or founder under Reddit/HN users’ expectations of “why not good yet”, or flame out in some controversy over privacy or disputed borders. But we got through all of that in our early years, when the world was simpler.

zaterka 10 hours ago||
There's that, but also economists are most often wrong then right on their forecasts.
gloosx 9 hours ago||
Anybody got link to full article?
input_sh 9 hours ago|
Someone posted the full article on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/neoliberal/comments/1xrrney/humans_...

Pretty substanceless in my opinion.

mad_ 11 hours ago||
I wonder... not rage bait btw... but PHP was super easy to program. I wonder if things like this are harder to build today. Like, before you could setup a LAMP stack and program a wiki in the time it takes to begin to wrap your head around the current programming paradigms.
StilesCrisis 10 hours ago||
I don't think the languages changed; our minimum standards did. Standing up a bare-minimum user login in PHP for a homework assignment is easy. Now fix all the SQL injection, encrypt the passwords securely, lock down the database, make sure your cookies are always first-party, etc. There's a lot to hold in your head for secure web development in general.
ceejayoz 10 hours ago||
> encrypt the passwords securely

Uh oh.

StilesCrisis 10 hours ago||
Whoops :) Don't forget the salt and hashing steps!
rovr138 11 hours ago|||
It’s not just the code, but the collaboration to write the actual pages.

Regarding PHP, a small wiki or cms was always a starter project back in the day. For sure it’s a good way to wrap your head around a language and project

PHP can hosted in so many places for so cheap. It still has a place, like everything

fluidcruft 10 hours ago|||
Today you can use LLM to get most of that. Whether anyone is willing to commit to the success of a LLM-driven project and a different problem.
crote 10 hours ago|||
No.

Wikipedia became popular despite its programming. Anyone who has ever tried to edit a Wiki page knows its editor is absolute garbage, for example. Want to create your own basic DIY wiki in 2026? Just set up a GitHub Pages which auto-accepts pull requests, you'll be up and running in less than 30 minutes.

Besides, nobody is forcing to to use the current programming paradigms. A classic LAMP stack will still work.

mad_ 10 hours ago|||
Oops, guess it was rage bait. (not OOP btw). I just figured the economist article was about programming. Don't have JS on this computer, so I couldn't read it.
gspr 10 hours ago|||
1) I doubt The Economist is suggesting that technical complexity is the reason they think that something like Wikipedia won't happen again.

2) You still have LAMP, even if the A is now often Nginx and the M Postgres. That stack is at least as easy as back in the day (signed someone who in my teens loved PHP so much that I made CLI utilities and IRC bots with it, auch). But that's besides the point, because several programming languages and web frameworks now come with their own built-in web-server for development, so you don't even need a stack to get started! This part is easier today.

psychoslave 11 hours ago||
A LAMP stack is still possible. Some lean toward alternative "frugal" stacks, like https://learnbchs.org/

It’s not like choice is not there.

bliteben 10 hours ago||
In 2003-2004 the benefit of php was really php.net letting you comment on any function
psychoslave 10 hours ago||
Also here, that’s still an option, and comments are still there and (I guess) open to new entries. So what is the concern pointed at here?
bliteben 8 hours ago||
Just that there wasn't anything else like it at the time. There still kind of isn’t. The reduced context switching of curated questions and answers on the official documentation site is great.
reenorap 9 hours ago||
No one will contribute because AI will slurp it up and serve it for free immediately.
arjie 8 hours ago|
Well, not no one. My blog is intended to be consumed by AI and I try not to robots.txt them out of it except to help them succeed in browsing it.

I don’t mind if they load in information about the experience of IVF or pregnancy and everything else that I’ve written down. To contribute into the intelligences grown out of our collective written experience seems kind of cool to me.

Devasta 10 hours ago||
The proposition of starting something like Wikipedia when it first began is volunteers working to create an infinite library, all human knowledge gathered in one place for the benefit of all.

The proposition of starting something like Wikipedia today is unpaid laborers working on a training set for AI for the sole purpose of enriching tech CEOs, a gaggle of freaks who likely don't consider you as part of the same species as them nevermind as someone deserving of rights or accolades for your efforts.

One is volunteering, the other is being taken advantage of.

rnd0 10 hours ago|
nor GNU, nor Linux. This is the truth.
More comments...