Just took a quick look at my home town. It seems to think two of the schools in the town are responsible for the education of the town's children - not sure what all the other schools think of that! It also failed to cover the very significant story of the restoration of the town's canal, instead making it sound like it had never closed and was then magically reintegrated into a wider network in one year.

I'd be interested to see a rigorous comparison of error rates. Perhaps need to use a better model.

you mean Reddit.

> disabled people

Writ broadly. Last time I looked into who was editing Wikipedia on my own academic discipline, it was several people who had an obsessive autistic fixation on the subject, but whose autism was apparently so socially debilitating they couldn't gain employment, not even in academia with its somewhat greater accommodation for oddballs. The upside is that they could channel their interest productively into WP. The downside of this is as outsiders to a field where much consensus is found only at real-life conferences and lecture handouts, their info was often years behind the state of the art (and, of course, WP demands that citations be to secondary sources, even if obsolete).

I keep them around. Harder for state and corporate propagandists to fight over twisting the truth.