Why all the Ai companies are dropping the names that meant something like flash, mini, pro to these meaningless name. It's very confusing

I'm really enjoying all these Gemini releases. I know a lot of people keep saying Google is too far behind in the race and that they dropped the ball to early but I don't feel that way at all. I had both Opus and Fable try to find a discreet bug in my codebase and both models assured me I had nothing to worry about and was probably overthinking. Argon was the only model that got to the bottom of the matter and developed the fix for me. I constantly find the Gemini models perform better in the real world as compared to the other frontier models and I also find they have less of the AI-isms that many of us have now come to associate with ChatGPT and Claude. Gemini feels like you're speaking to a comrade. Claude feels like you're speaking to a friend and it's an important distinction I feel.

Google are doing such a terrible job. They aren't allowing Pro accounts access to this in antigravity that they gave to students or via mobile plans elsewhere, because they messed up badly and don't have the compute. They have been absolutely horrible about communicating this and even gaslighting the users, completely nerfing the same models that they do get to use, without telling them that they are doing.

So after being caught up in this, it's left a very bad taste and I'm subscribing elsewhere.

Oh hey my google workspace account actually got this. It was on like 3.6 and 3.1 for a long time.

I went to geminiIsland[1] and asked for spongebob's, squidward's, and patrick's houses [1] https://geminisland.raph.plus/

These names are honestly too confusing. Given carbon, hydrogen, and argon I have no clue from the names which is small, medium, and large

Gemini was never my first choice. The only thing built on Google models I use is NotebookLM.

Where is Gemma5?

Where is Gemma5?

Where is Gemma5?

Where is Gemma5?

[dead]

[dead]